02 / UX evaluationOCT 2024–JUL 2025
User Experience Evaluation of UAVs For Remote Border Monitoring
Interviews with 10 frontline operators and five aircraft design engineers identified communication disruption as a concern during operations in mountainous terrain.
View project ↗
Study details
I translated field feedback into design requirements for satellite communications. After integration, we ran ground and flight usability tests at Cijulang Airport in Indonesia. I surveyed 30 onsite operators and engineers after functional validation to gather feedback for the next iteration.
01 / Cross-language & cross-cultural AI adoptionJAN–MAR 2026
GenAI-driven Text Adaptation for GCS Interfaces
How can a ground control station adapt to operators working across languages while preserving aviation terminology and fitting the available screen space?
View project ↗
Study details
I interviewed Thai and Indonesian operators and collaborated with Chinese engineers. I designed structured prompts for Chinese-to-English abbreviations using aviation terminology and interface length constraints. Three domain experts reviewed the outputs, and 25 operators from Thailand, Indonesia, and the UAE took part in simulation tasks to identify ambiguous wording and moments of hesitation.
03 / AI reliabilityAUG 2026–IN PROGRESS
East Asian Users’ Experiences in Voice Interaction with Generative AI
How do East Asian speakers using English as a second language respond when generative AI misunderstands them? This study examines which adjustments participants experience as compromises and how they describe changes in trust.
View project ↗
Study details
I recruited 24 participants, eight native speakers each of Mandarin, Korean, and Japanese. Each participant began ten tasks in ChatGPT Voice with a scripted English request, then chose how to respond if the system misunderstood them. I recorded the interactions, asked about trust at three points, and used video playback in semi-structured interviews to explore participants’ choices.
The analysis combines interaction coding, descriptive statistics, and reflexive thematic analysis. It compares observed actions, such as rephrasing a request or switching to typing, with participants’ explanations of whether those actions felt like compromises. Task completion and self-reported trust are analyzed separately.